Clearly Current

All About Timeless Trends and the Latest News

Big This Week

Recent Posts

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

iPhone 11 Pro: The Technology of the Future

Above: iPhone 11 Pro comes in a new color, Midnight Green.
Image Credit: Apple
With the high price tag of the iPhones, there needs to be a reason for people to buy a new phone when the current phones we use work. However, there's a difference between a phone that works and a phone that offers comfort, convenience, and reliability. The improvements with the iPhone 11 Pro are enough to warrant its price. If there ever was a time to purchase a new phone from Apple, now is the time.

1. Battery Increase - The iPhone 11 Pro has the biggest battery increase. The iPhone 11 Pro offers 3190 mAh, much more battery life than any of the previous iPhones.

For comparison of the battery:
2019 iPhone 11 Pro: 3,190 mAh
2018 iPhone XS: 2,658 mAh
2017 iPhone X: 2,716 mAh
2015 iPhone 6S:1,715 mAh battery

Clearly, the 2019 iPhone 11 Pro has the best battery at 3,190 mAh. Now, you may be wondering, "What is mAh?" Well, mAh stands for milliamp Hour and it is a unit that measures electric power over time. In general, the more mAh, the longer the battery capacity or battery life. A higher number means that the battery can store more energy, so it has a higher capacity.

Apple claims that the iPhone 11 will last for an hour longer on its battery than the 2018 iPhone. For people who are checking text messages, making phone calls, surfing the internet, watching videos, taking pictures, reading this blog post, a longer lasting battery means more convenience. You have the piece of mind knowing you are able to use your phone longer without needing to charge it.


Above: iPhone 11 Pro reveal at September event.
Image Credit: Apple


2. Best iPhone Camera - The iPhone 11 Pro has a new camera that will put any older iPhone camera to shame. As you have seen from the pictures of the new iPhone, the camera lens has completely changed to a new triple-lens array camera.

Above: The triple lens camera on the iPhone 11 Pro.
Image Credit: Apple.
The enhancements include a new ultra wide-angle camera and a Night Mode for low-light photography. The wide-angle lens has a f/1.8 aperture, the ultra-wide has a f/2.4 aperture, and the telephoto lens has a f/2.0 aperture. Aperture is measured by f-stops. A smaller aperture number means  the aperture is more open, which lets more light into the camera to take pictures in low light. Night mode turns on automatically and makes shooting in low light a breeze. With Night mode, there's no need for flash and photos appear brighter even when the lighting isn't on your side.

The selfie or Portrait mode camera has improved to a 12 megapixel camera from a 7 megapixel camera. The front-facing camera also has a new wide-angle option, which is great for imitating the effect of a selfie stick.

The iPhone 11 Pro is capable of 4K video at 60fps, much like the iPhone XS, but comes with improved dynamic range and cinematic video stabilization. The 60 fps means 60 frames per second. Frames per second (fps) refers to the speed at which cameras can produce photos. The current industry standard for clear, smooth video with moving objects is 30 fps, but obviously 60 fps is better.


Above: A13 has three main processing engines.
Image Credit: Apple

3. Apple A13 Bionic Chip - The A13 Bionic Chip is a 64- bit ARM-based system on a chip (SoC). The chip has improved machine learning, with a neural engine alongside the CPU (central processing unit) and GPU (graphics processing unit). It has machine learning accelerators that can process six times faster than the previous A12 Chip. The CPU is capable of 1 trillion operators per second.
Share:

Saturday, April 21, 2018

China Singer Competition: British Singer Wins

China's 2018 "Singer Competition" awarded first place to British performer Jessie J.

"Singer", as the name would imply is a singing competition show much like "X Factor," but instead of showcasing new singers, "Singer" puts already renowned performers head to head.  Jessie J won crowds over with her fashionable ensembles, appreciation for Chinese culture, and obviously singing chops.

Jessie J revealed in an interview following her win that she was "asked to compete in a singing competition in China... alongside the biggest established singer/artists across Asia." While no doubt Jessie J's enjoyed her "3.5 months" (Instagram) in China, Jessie J has certainly found a large market for her music.  China is home to 1.38 billion people. (For comparison, Britain is home to 65.64 million people).

As you'd expect, Jessie J couldn't very well say she decided to go to China to build a fanbase for her music. Not at all. Jessie J's response was that she was trying to "bridge a gap between two cultures."

Marina Hyde, writer for The Guardian humorously noted that she believes the arrangement "to have been made in a bilateral Sino-British huddle during a session break of the UN security council."

Watch Jessie J's rendition of the Titanic theme song "My Heart Will Go On."


Share:

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Lack of Sleep for College Students | Sleep=Unicorn


Fun fact: College students are the most sleep deprived group of people. As a college student, I find that one of the things that is missing from my day is sleep. Yes, I know.  Sleep is a vital indicator of overall health and wellbeing. Getting sleep is important. But if you go to any college campus and ask any random student, there's no doubt most students would say they didn't get more than seven hours of sleep. For many students, getting eight hours or more of sleep is nearly impossible.

People (middle school and high school students) might ask, "Why do college students get so little sleep?" Well, let me answer that question for you.


Share:

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Ethical Journalism

The journalism profession is one that has gotten a fair share of backlash following the presidential election. The media has been blamed for influencing the outcome of this election by focusing far too much negative attention on certain candidates. The paramount rule of journalism involves knowing the rule that a journalist should “Do No Harm.”

One way to interpret this is that doing no harm means that journalists treat their sources with respect. Journalists should have compassion, especially when asking questions that might cause their source distress. For example, if a journalist were to ask a question to a mother at a crime scene where her loved ones had been harmed, the journalist should not begin asking questions without first acknowledging the devastating situation. Journalists should write their stories in a way that is respectful of the feelings of their sources. First and foremost, journalists are human beings, who should show understanding for people.

While it is important to follow the trail of a hard-hitting news story, journalists should not be intrusive when pursuing a story. In the example of the mother at the crime scene, a journalist could sympathize with the mother and offer words of comfort before launching into reporter mode. In addition, journalists have to make the decision of whether the public’s need to know the story outweighs the potential harm it may create. 

The adage "the pen is mightier than the sword" is most certainly true. Journalists should weigh the consequences of publishing information that could harm private individuals. When journalists often do research into people’s pasts to write a story, they might find offensive material about their subject that would make a great news story, but also damage the reputation of the person they are writing about. Journalists must decide if the benefits of letting the public know about the crimes that someone had committed in the past would outweigh the damage such a revelation would do to that person’s job, family, and life.

For journalists, minimizing harm also means making sure that their sources of information are correct. Journalists should do their own research to make sure that their source of information is the right one. If reporters write a story proclaiming that someone is guilty of a crime, the reporters should double check that what they are writing is true. For example in the case of Boston Marathon bombing, the journalists should have double checked the sources they used for their stories. Speculation without facts allowed journalists to damage a reputation of an innocent boy. The damage to the innocent boy could have been avoided had the reporters done more research.

When journalists and editors make a decision to publish something that could harm someone, they consider the public’s benefit from knowing the information. If the public’s need to know the information outweighs the harm it would do to someone, the news story should be published.
Share:

Monday, December 19, 2016

The Economic Aftermath of the Presidential Election

The U.S. Presidential Inauguration for Donald Trump will take place on January 20, 2017, in Washington, D.C.

BOSTON — The stock market soared the day after Donald J. Trump was elected as the 45th president of the United States. While Trump and his supporters saw this as a positive sign, it remains to be seen how his policies will impact the economy.

For a brief period after it was announced that Trump had attained 276 electoral college votes, the U.S. stock markets mirrored confusion some Americans felt on the morning after the election. Shortly after midnight Tuesday as the election results rolled in,, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 506 points as investors braced themselves for Trump’s policies. However, following Trump’s acceptance speech Wednesday morning, the financial markets steadied. By noon Wednesday stocks rallied and have been climbing overall since then.

“We have a great economic plan,” Trump said in his victory speech. “We will double our growth and have the strongest economy anywhere in the world.”

Throughout the election, Trump has said he would lower taxes for all Americans in order to boost the economy. In the economic plan he released before the election, Trump focused on tax restructuring. His plan would reduce the number of tax brackets from seven to three. This means the highest income earners will be paying less in taxes and the middle class will be paying more.

Trump’s plan would raise the lowest income tax rate from 10% to 12%, eliminate the head of household option and repeal personal exemptions.

Trump also has pledged to slash corporate taxes, which he said will bring companies and jobs back to the United States.

"We're going to rebuild our infrastructure,” Trump said in his acceptance speech Nov. 9. “We will put millions of our people to work as we rebuild it.”

Abhijit Banerjee, who teaches economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said cutting taxes would increase spending in the short run. However, in the long run, he said, it would depend on the impacts of loss in tax revenue.

“If it reduces government spending on welfare or investment in infrastructure, people may end up poorer.” Banerjee said.

According to CNN, investors felt calmer and less uncertain after hearing Trump’s acceptance speech, in which he showed a calmer and more conciliatory side. Trump’s comments about increasing both tax cuts and infrastructure spending encouraged investors.

Reuters reported Nov. 11 that Warren Buffett, an American business investor and billionaire, predicts that a Donald Trump presidency would be good for the stock market.

"The stock market will be higher 10, 20, 30 years from now," Buffett said to Reuters.

In an interview with Bloomberg LP, Mark Gallongly, a member of President Barack Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, said Trump’s acceptance speech was more reassuring than his campaign but encouraged investors to be cautious.

“This has been an election driven by personality and a few big themes, and very little on specifics of his policy,” he said to Bloomberg. “So what he’s going to do will reveal itself over the next number of months.”

To be sure, the impact of Trump’s economic plans are unknown.

Dr. Manove, a professor of microeconomics at Boston University, said that the success of Trump’s tax policy depends on how individual consumers act. While cutting taxes could increase spending and thereby boost the economy, it also creates a problem. People might not be as motivated to work.

“If someone gives you 1 million dollars, would you spend it or would you work harder?”
Share:

Monday, December 5, 2016

Jeffrey Seglin: How Childhood Experiences Shaped His Life

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — With a pair of dark-rimmed spectacles perched upon his nose, a snowy white beard, and friendly blue eyes, Jeffrey Seglin has a indubitable Santa quality. Appearances aside, Seglin also doesn’t mind being asked questions by those people of all ages. He encourages people to send him letters about their ethical dilemmas and then gifts his readers with the answers to their questions in his column, “The Right Thing.”

Seglin began writing his ethics column for The New York Times business section in 1998. At the time, he scoured through piles of newspapers and magazine clips on his desk to find inspiration. In 2004, The New York Times began publishing Seglin’s column weekly. He wrote about everything from corporate malfeasance to everyday ethical dilemmas his readers faced. Titles of his columns included “Your Parents Or Your Spouse,” “When Finders Aren’t Keepers,” and “Kids And Politicians Should Avoid Lying.”

As he wrote, Seglin noticed readers were sending him questions about etiquette in response to his column. Then, when a publisher approached him to write a book about business etiquette, Seglin felt compelled to accept. His newest book, “The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice,” explores the relationship between ethics and etiquette.

“Ethics is the moral underpinnings for behavior while etiquette is how we agree to behave in social settings,” Seglin said.

He bills his book as a survival guide on how to succeed socially in business and deal with complicated situations. It covers everything from dealing with difficult bosses to the right way to use social media. In the book, Seglin gives answers with “a touch of whimsy.” He tried to make sure his book was fun to read.

“I wanted to make it such that it wasn’t too preachy,” Seglin said. “I wanted to try and engage the reader as much as possible.”

Born in the late 1950s, Seglin narrowly missed the draft for the Vietnam War.  He had registered and received a lottery number, but soon the draft was suspended.

Seglin shares the hallmark baby-boomer traits of those born in the years after World War II. Those close to him say his idealistic and uncynical attitude have allowed him to live life with an open mind and face dilemmas with reason. A telling example: One of his Tweets about the presidential election says, “To all my friends on Twitter. No matter how things turn out tomorrow, I will still love you. Now, go out & vote.”

Life Lessons at the Arcade.

As a kid growing up in northern New Jersey, Seglin enjoyed playing games in the arcade next to the supermarket where his parents shopped. Even there, he faced an ethical dilemma. When he was 11 years old, Seglin found an unplayed game left on the arcade machine. The machine had a malfunction and allowed him to continue playing several games in a row without paying. This ended when the arcade repair man came up to him and questioned if he had paid for the game. Seglin wondered what he should do. He paused and didn’t answer the question, but the repairman pointed at the coin slot that had been taped shut. The repairman could tell no one had paid for the games; Seglin realized he’d done the wrong thing. This early experience with lying is an example of the type of question he would seek to address later in his life: What is the “right thing” to do? Coincidentally, it was during that same year that a significant event happened in the Vietnam War. Colonel George Day was taken prisoner by the North Vietnamese on August 26, 1967. As a high school student in Boonton, New Jersey in 1971, Seglin wore a bracelet inscribed the name of a prisoner of war, “Col. George Day,” in protest of the Vietnam War. Thousands of people wore the POW/MIA bracelets during the waning days of the war as a testament that POWs not be forgotten. Seglin wore the $2.50 bracelet throughout high school all the way to his freshman year in college, and he then kept it with him as he moved duringover the years.In 2003, while searching for material for his column, Seglin read an article in The New York Times about cases the Supreme Court had declined to hear. Something about the newspaper clipping made him pause. One case was about military recruiters misleading young men to serve in the military for at least 20 years, falsely saying they would gain medical benefits. The name of the man leading the case was a veteran from Florida named George E. Day. The name seemed familiar to Seglin. He soon realized that Colonel George E. Day was the same name as the one on histhe POW/MIA bracelet. Seglin set up a meeting with Day. However, Seglin found himself in a dilemma. Day had served in the Vietnam war and experienced 67 months of grueling captivity in North Vietnam. Seglin wanted to give Day the POW bracelet that he’d worn as a sign of protest against the war, but he feared the colonel would disapprove. Nevertheless, Seglin took the bracelet with him to meet Day.It turned out the colonel didn’t know the bracelets were in protest of the war. It wasn’t comfortable, but Seglin explained the meaning of the bracelets and how they had been a symbol worn by those opposed to the war. “You can be polite and also be honest with someone,” Seglin said. Seglin’s expertise is especially relevant in light of the 2016 election.“Letting someone run over you is not etiquette— that’s giving up,” he said. “Finding a way to deal with difficult people is a challenge all of us face.” Figure of Wisdom Even a seasoned author like Seglin gets writer’s block. “The hardest part was actually sitting down to write and having the motivation to get it done,” he said. Seglin credits his wife, who is a therapist, as his first book editor. With his newest book, his wife helped him plan out his writing schedule. She divided the 40,000 words by the number of days he had to write the final draft. She then doubled it to give Seglin extra time to edit. “I had a goal of so many words per day,” Seglin said. “She helped me do it, knowing I had to manage other stuff in the process.”Time spent on the book was time away from his other responsibilities. Seglin wrote the book while being both a parent and a grandparent. He is also a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. With his background in journalism, Seglin wants to teach a new generation of writers. In dealing with students everyday, Seglin realizes the crucial role that he plays in shaping his students.“He’s often meeting with students to discuss their writing,” his assistant, Alison Kommer, said.Now nearly sixty, Seglin nevertheless is nevertheless able to relate to his students. He treats them how he would like to be treated. In 2014, Seglin’s students nominated him for the Carballo Award, an annual honor to a Kennedy School faculty member recognizing their dedication to students, excellence in the professional field and commitment to public service. “I try to teach them with the same graciousness that I expect them to treat me.” Seglin said. “Of course, we don’t have sit down dinners with candlelight, but I do try to respect them and realize that my job is to teach and be here for the students.”Seglin’s makes sure to impart the lessons he learned as a child. Recently, he wrote about whether or not to agree with a relative’s politics to make them stop talking. He said that there is no ethical upside to pretending to hold a position simply to appease another. As for his thoughts about the the 2016 election, Seglin answered with a quote by Michelle Obama: ‘When they go low, we go high.’ “If they’re going to the lowest possible behavior, you go to the highest possible behavior,” Seglin said. “It doesn’t mean that attacks go unanswered, but [respond] with civility and directness, not offensive language, lies, or character assassination.”
Share:
© Clearly Current | All rights reserved.
Blogger Template Developed by pipdig